.
.
  • Home-Latest Articles
  • Educational Articles
  • Solutions and Advices
  • Family Matters
  • Useful Links
  • Audio Section
  • Current Affairs
  • Q & A
  • Contact Details
  • Who Are We

                                              

                                    Telegram              Instagram          Facebook         Twitter              Whatsapp       YouTube Channel    

 

 

 

Random Articles

  • Moulood-The Stance of the Sharia-Part 3
  • In the Name of Islam by Hazrat Maulana Yunus Patel Saheb (rahmatullah alayh)
  • JUSA CENTURY/DISSERVICE AND DILUTION
  • A RESPONSE TO SUNNI ULAMA BOARD-MUFTI SALEJEE'S FATWA
  • FORMATION OF THE ORIGINAL JUSA/UUCSA
  • JAMIAT KZN FATWA AGAINST INTERFAITH
  • Modern “halal” meat is a mockery of Islam
  • VACCINE DAMAGE
  • QUESTIONS TO MUFTI SHAFIQ JAKHURA REGARDING HIS TAKAFUL LECTURE
  • Digital Photography | The End Result; Not the Means to the End

WOMEN OF WONDER
THE WOMEN OF JANNAH

In Suraah Ahzaab, Allah Ta`aala has mentioned the following ten qualities which every Muslim man and woman should strive to inculcate in themselves. But here we focus on our sisters in Islam who will be The women of Jannah for having the following qualities:

1. She is a Muslimah:
She readily, willingly and cheerfully submits to Allah’s commands. She does not question the wisdom of the Shariah. “Men have charge over women” says Allah Ta'Aala. The woman of wonder does not believe in “gender equality, etc.” and does not suffer from an inferior complex, as she is fully aware that in her role as a home executive she gains the Pleasure of Allah Ta`aala.

2. She is a Mu’minah:
Filled with Imaan from head to toe, her faith is unshakable. Her quest and mission in life: to perfect her Imaan and serve her husband.

3. She is Contented:
The woman of Jannah is more than contented with her lot. She craves not an iota nor a drop of the Dunya. She has no complaints nor demands. She does not waste her time roaming in malls etc. as this does not enthrall her.

4. She is Truthful:
Truthfulness is her trademark. In intention, in speech and deed, the woman of wonder is truthful to Allah and His Rasul (Sallallahu alayhi Wasallam). She is loyal to her husband. She detests falsehood, hypocrisy and pretence.

5. She has Sabr:
The woman of Jannah is a mountain of Sabr. She has accepted Sabr as her lot since her desire is to enter Jannah. Sabr with her husband, Sabr with in-laws, Sabr with children, Sabr in overseeing the affairs of her home. Sabr, yes Sabr — lots and lots of it.

6. She is Humble:
Hidden deep within the bowels of the earth, lay gems and gold. These are only of benefit when the earth is cut and sliced apart. The earth seldom takes offence. Instead it yields its riches to the very ones who destroyed its features. The women of Jannah is as humble as the earth, full of goodness to others without expecting anything in return. She seeks no name, no fame, no glory, no prizes, no acknowledgement for her deeds.

7. She is Charitable:
The woman of Jannah is always looking for ways to be charitable. In her free time, some times she would cook a pot of food for the poor or invite relatives. Sometimes knit a garment for an orphan. In speech she is charitable with praises for others. And yes, she fears propagating her charitable acts, lest it is told to her on the Day of Qiyaamah to find her rewards by those whom she sought to please in the World.

8. She Fasts:
Bearing her health in mind, she fasts regularly. Nafl fasts are conditional to her husband’s approval. Fardh fasts not so. The woman of Jannah hastens to complete her Qadha fasts.

9. She is Chaste:
The woman of Jannah jealously guards her chastity. In accordance to the commands of Allah Ta’ala she lowers her eyesight; remains glued indoors and converses in a non-alluring manner with strangers in times of severe need, from behind a curtain. The woman of wonder acts upon the Holy Qur’aan and ensures that she avoids anything that may attract the attention of forbidden males to herself.
Thus, she never passes the gathering of men having applied perfumes, nor does she attend weddings where she is exposed to others on the roads, etc. Rasullullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam honoured Hadhrat Fatima Radiallahu anha because she said that the best conduct of a woman is: “They (women) should not look at men and men should not look at them.” Such is the high degree of chastity of a woman of wonder!

10. She Remembers Allah in abundance:
The woman of Jannah does not waste her precious time.
More precious than a pearl necklace around her neck, is a Tasbeeh in her hand. This soothes her aching heart which is always desirous for meeting Allah Ta’ala.


A woman of Jannah is intelligent and has no urge to prove how clever she is by hankering for a university degree. She recognizes that Allah has created her differently and that her role in life is different form that of a man. She understands fully that her husband is the door to her Jannah and service to him the key to that door. She does not betray his secrets nor seek the pleasure of others — be it her very own parents — at the expense of her husband’s displeasure. A wise shepherdess she is to her flock, caring and feeding them, clothing them and educating them, ever mindful that no harm befalls them and no pain afflicts them.


HER PRIZE!

Such a woman of Jannah has been promised by Allah His Forgiveness and an immense reward!

Such a woman’s name will echo throughout the plains of Qiyaamah. Her prize will be an entry into Jannah from any of its’ eight gates. Owing to her fear of Allah, perhaps to her surprise, she will find two Jannahs awaiting her. Therein she will know no pain, tiredness or fear. Gone are the days of making Sabr. Forever she will remain young with countless of servants to serve her. Every conceivable delight will be at her fingertips. A lifetime was spent cooking, baking, frying, washing and in worry. Now she will simply be pampered with the most choicest of dishes. In lieu of remaining glued to the four walls of her house, she will be permitted to roam and fly on horses made of gold. In return for her obedience to Allah and His Rasul Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam, she now will sit with a crown on her head and have scores of damsels to beckon.

In return for upholding the correct Shar’i Hijaab, she will be adorned with clothing that will consist of seventy colorful shades. This true wonder of a woman’s prize is “what no eyes had seen, no ears had heard and no mind had conceived.”

May Allah Ta'aala grant all our sisters in Islam the Taufeeq to pursue this dream. (Ameen)

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
ARE WE COWARDS?

MOULANA IMRAN ADMANI SAHEB HAFIZAHULLAH

The problem today, is not that we don't know what is right and wrong, it's not that we don't know what is hallal and haraam, but it's that the mojority of us choose to ignore it. The selfless care that was once present in people is quickly vanishing, with people living in their own bubble. Unfazed, unaffected, and unmoved by the turmoil, evil, and misguidance. We prefer to deal only with those problems that affect us. Personal benefits, relationships, status, wealth, and social recognition of a person are prioritised when making a decision between right and wrong. In this world of injustice, it doesn't matter what claim we have it matters about who we are. A sort of discrimination has entered into Islam. With knowledge, wealth, and rank, taking priority over a person's deeds and good character. Don't even get started on the fact that if you are a female who has been abused. You speak out, and you are considered someone who has no modesty. The only option is to stay silent, hoping and praying that one day, the evil islamic preacher that abused you gets what he deserves.

This selfish mentally has infected the muslims far and wide. We can see the evedent damage of this behaviour all around us. Look how people have made our religion a toy. People are making all sorts of rules and making the hallal haraam. Many ulema see this happening. They know it is against the teachings of Islam, yet they adopt silence. Fear of the backlash they may get? They choose cowardice over their deen? People have become scared to speak out and question the mufties and shaikhs over what seems to be decisions that go directly against islam. Everyone becomes a hero when it comes to speaking out against those who burn the quran, but so many of us become mice when the culprits that are changing the deen are own scholars. They are doing more damage than the quran burners, yet our lips are sealed tight.

Because of the silence of the mojority, free mixing has become rampant, even being practised by mufties and shaikul hadeeths. If you question these people, they will resort to asking us what position and knowledge we have to question them. People in the wrong have moved away from quoting the quran, sunnah of nabi ﷺ, and the sahaba radiallahu anhum as a justification for their actions. Instead, they refer to the actions of other prominent ulema of this generation to vindicate themselves. Since when did the actions of high-ranking mufties become a source of justification in islam?

I am a sinful person, but that does not mean I should sit silently on the sidelines while people disrespect my nabi ﷺ, by attributing to deen that which is haraam. Will nabi ﷺ turn his face away from me on qiyamah day because I decided to look the other way? What answer will we give to Allah when questioned what effort we made to stop this?

If we were alive in the time of nabi ﷺ, most likely, we would have been the cowards and munafiqeens that would have fled the battle of Uhud before it began. Today, we are too scared to speak up for islam, do we think we would have been able to raise a sword and lay down our life?

I don't know about you, but my heart hurts, I cant stay silent anymore. I can't sit and watch all this happen and not say something. I can't sit and not do anything. I might be the biggest sinner in the world, but I won't let that stop me from speaking out against that evil, which people do in the name of Islam, to fool and decieve people. If they are not shy to openly break the laws of Islam and make hallal that which is haraam, why should I be shy to question it?

The question is, will you be sitting silently on the sidelines eating pop corn and watching while these people try and railroad islam? While these so-called scholars all around the world use islam to fill their pockets and bring evil to our doorstep? Are you mice or men? Are you like the munafiqs of the time of nabi ﷺ? Or will you be standing up for islam? Will you be speaking out and raising your voice for YOUR DEEN? Will you be standing up for our nabi ﷺ, and turning away these misguided scholars and preachers from our mimbers?

It's time to earn junnah and save ourselves from jahannam. May Allah guide us and keep us guided, may he save us from fitna and being a means of fitna.

Ameen

و عليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

A BREATH OF FRESH AIR AND REQUEST FROM JAMIAT KZN ON JUSA INTERFAITH

Masha Allah ,it was a breath of fresh air to read Jamiat KZN fatwa against interfaith prayers of MJC,rightfully so,when they are a member of UUCSA.

Alhamdulillah Jamiat KZN have always opposed the Liberal cartel of UUCSA which includes MJC,Darul Ihsaan and JUSA on matters that are clearly against the Shariah.

Once again they have come out in condemnation of fellow UUCSA members in terms of interfaith prayer which is totally unislamic.

It would be good if they also write to JUSA as Mufti Ebrahim Salejee had mentioned and Inform them that Nelson Mandela and other interfaith prayers are not Islamic.

No darul Uloom in South Africa will ever approve of JUSA interfaith prayers or the intermingling that they engage in.

It is time that the Ulama fraternity one by one fight against the fitna of Liberalism in this country by speaking out against the agents amongst us.

HADHRAT MUFTI EBRAHIM SALEJEE COMMENTING ON THE INTERFAITH PRAYERS OF JUSA AND MJC

Bismihi Ta`ala

Haamidan wa Musalliyan

Respected Brother / Sister in Islam

Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakaatuh

The Jamiat KZN has released a statement against this type of behaviour. It is about time that these people understand that Islam is an exclusive deen and it does not entertain any type of dilution and contamination.

Like milk, if a drop of urine is inserted into a litre of milk no sane person will drink it. Islam does not entertain these things. It is perhaps advisable that the statement of the Jamiat KZN be brought to their attention, and people in general be educated. Even better would be that these types of organisations should say that they do not represent Islam, rather some other organization or cult so that the public understands their status, that this is a political movement and has nothing to do with Islam. This kind of behaviour under the banner of Islam is disgusting and sickening.

Therefore, if they are not happy with the true values of Islam then they should be brave enough to say that they are not fully satisfied with the undiluted Islam and they are departing to a different system so that people may know that they do not represent Islam and their minds may not be in a state of confusion.

And Allah Ta`ala knows best

(Mufti) E Salejee

Madrasah Taleemuddeen

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

The Devils recipe for desaster

Moulana Imran Admani Saheb Hafizahullah

There were 2 brothers whose parents were great chefs. They were from a great bloodline whose family had been known for their dishes. As the 2 brothers grew up, they learnt the recipes and method of cooking from their parents. Both of them grew up to be outstanding chefs.

One day, the older brother said to the other, we must now improve the dishes that we have been taught. We must add new ingredients and make the food look more presentable. However, the younger brother reminded him that these recipes have been in thier family for generations and have proven to be effective. Not only do they taste good, but people feel renergised and don't get sick from them.

To this, the brother remarked that if our ancestors were alive today, they themselves would have changed the ingredients because all the new ingredients available today were not available to them. After some back and forth, the 2 brothers decided to go their own way in business.

Some time later, the brother opened his own restaurant opposite his brother's restaurant. His food looked better than his brothers food. It smelt better and even tasted better. People from around the world started to flock to his restaurant. While he got more busy, his younger brother started losing business. Yet he knew that his ancestors must have chosen these ingredients for a reason, so he stayed firm on it, regardless of the lack of success.

Many years later, people started falling sick, and they started getting weaker at a younger age than before. People were getting heart attacks at 30. As people were strangely dying, the government started an investigation. The pathologists discovered that their was an unauthorised food ingredient in their body, which they had consumed over a span of years that had caused the sudden deaths. On further investigation, they found that this ingredient was being used in the older brothers' restaurant, which was famous for its dishes.

As investigations began, the brother was questioned over why he had moved away from the original recipe. He replied by saying the times were changing, if he had not made changes, and utilised these ingredients, then someone else would have. If he didn't do it, then someone else would have done it incorrectly. The older brother made it sound like he was doing it for the people.

The police retorted him by saying he actually did it for himself. While he already had a completely fine recipe that had been proven to work for decades, what was the need in changing it just for the people? In actual fact, he made the change for himself so he could attain fame. Thereafter, he was taken by police to the jail.

My respected brothers, sisters, and elders. This is actually the situation of the world today. This is the situation of our preachers. They want to deviate from the path of nabi ﷺ, they want to deviate from the ways of the sahaba radiallahu anhum, and they want to diviate from the teachings of islam, in hopes to appease the people and get a bigger audience. They want people to praise them and cheer their name. People eating the tainted food may not have realised its danger, yet still paid for it with their health and some even with their lives.

Why would anyone change that which nabi ﷺ and islam have taught us. Why would anyone want to move away from the perfect formula of islam?

Today, we see preachers and scholars deviating from the method of preaching taught by islam and our pious predecessors. They mix hallal with haraam, claiming that the times have changed. People may listen to their eloquence of speech, they may feel in awe of their words, and they feel inspired by their knowledge. But in reality, it's all shrouded in sin and evil. The energy they pass on is that of negativity. It is a dark energy due to the corruption of the heart of the preacher. If the preacher is committing sins in the name of Islam, then what spiritual benefit will his words be able to have upon the muslims in the long run.

Unfortunately, those people who end up a victim to this may never realise it until it's too late.

The older chef may have served more tasty food, but in the end, at what cost to the peoples lives and at what cost to himself? The second chef may have had fewer customers, but at least his and their lives were safe. Quality over quantity.

Whom our words will benefit is not in our control, but what methods we use is. Let us worry about doing the right thing, and leave the rest in the hands of Allah.

May Allah always guide us to correct Ulama, may He guide us, keep us guided, make us a means of guidance, may He save us from fitnahs, and being a means of fitnah.

Ameen

و عليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

FORESIGHT OF OUR SENIORS- THE ULAMA E HAQ

A NOTE THAT WILL RUFFLE THE FEATHERS OF THE HAUGHTY.

Whilst the times we are currently witnessing are very disturbing, here's something good I have always known but never realized.

The something that i have known but never realized is the absolute foresight (firaasat) of our senior Ulama in general and in particular, the foresight of Saahibe Majlis - Moulana Ahmed Sadek Saheb Desai of Port Elizabeth.

Years ago - literally, perhaps decades ago, he had already publicly declared that JUSA, MJC, Radio Shaytaan, and Co. are off the track. Years ago, he had warned us as the Muslim community of South Africa to be aware of the snares of these monsters on our mimbars and devils on air. Years ago, he noted and begun taking action against the evils which we partially realize today.

Then, in those far gone days, when i was like many others. We, many, if not most Muslims of South Africa would frown at his seemingly harsh approach and counted his warnings as something farfetched, we thought we knew better. We thought who is he to brand people and we questioned who he is to expose others.
In fact, many of us were at the brink of war! War with not the majlisis of those times. Rather, many of us unknowingly almost found ourselves at war with Allah Azza Wa Jal - It is mentioned that the one who hurts the Wali of Allah, Allah Ta’ala declares war on him.

However, today, as I pen down this observation down, the Ulama-e-haq are united like never before. I mean, from the shore line of Port Shepston to the outskirts of Lenaisia, from the farmland of De Deur to the sea shore of Isipingo, from well known town of Azaadville to the friendly cirty of Port Elizabeth, from UUCSA's own members to the founding members of Wifaqul Ulama, In uniform, the Ulama across South Africa warn us of these gangs of so-called Ulama who are bent on not only destroying the foundations of Islamic laws and protocols. Today, they are gnawing at the foundation of our islamic beliefs - at the root of our Imaan.

O' brother Muslims of South Africa, open your eyes and see the foresight, wisdom and truth of our pious Ulama. Join them in their efforts and hold tight to their teachings for the Quran Kareem states: Join the company of the pious.
Don't ever again make that mistake of assuming that the Ulama-e-haq don't know the facts, don't ever make that mistake of assuming that the Ulama just talk and write because they have nothing else to do and don't ever assume that their warnings are farfetched.

O' students of the madaaris and O' young Ulama! You people generally have a tendency of assuming that you know it all. Beware of assuming that you are smarter than your seniors. Look at the example we are living through; Look at when Saahibe Majlis understood what we are trying to still figure out today. Some thirty years later? How true was our Nabi Alaihi Salaam not when he said to the effect: Beware of the firaasat of a Mu'min because he sees with the noor of Allah.

Despite the difficult times, came to light is the foresight of our seniors and, despite the difficult times, came to our shore the unity we once could only dream of.

MAULANA BHAMS HOUGHTON MUSJID DECEPTION

Maulana Bham and JUSA love to lull the masses into a deception so that they can have scope to still push the agenda that they have been recruited to push.

For this he employs master diversion tactics,we have pointed out how he uses incidents out of context to try and bolster his Agenda.

This time he appealed to anonymity and to try and purposely make the matter political, the objective of making matters political is to automatically switch people's minds off to the valid criticism that is directed at him and JUSA.

He also claimed that no one wants to meet and discuss, which is a blatant lie,numerous individuals have contacted Maulana Bham and his Jamiat to meet with them yet they do not follow through.


These issues are diversions from the reality.

The Akaabir and now even lay men and numerous Ulama do not have personal beef with JUSA,the matters being brought up are clear cut, concrete and serious issues,the matter of interfaith prayers and intermingling has been ignored time and time again.

It is Maulana Bham and his Agenda that has forced the likes of Maulana Abdul Hamid saaheb and Mufti Salejee Saaheb to speak out,they are well established and do not have any personal gain in exposing the clear cut Haraam issues.

Anyone is free to write to any darul uloom and enquire regarding the activities and one would receive a standard response of the issues being problematic, even if a person does not mention JUSA and enquires regarding interfaith prayer,intermingling and promoting soccer and TV all will recieve a response of impermisibility,how does this fit in to the personal agenda or beef card of Maulana Bham?


Instead of trying to brainwash to masses to believe all objections to the Jamiat and Maulana Bham are political and Ego driven,he should rather take the time to answer the questions posed on these issues

Using Hazrat Mufti Khanpuri Daamat barakaatuhm To Create Fitna

Bismillāhir Rahmānir Rahīm

The audio clip of Hazrat Mufti Ahmad Khanpuri Saheb Dāmat Barakātuh regarding the Tashaddud of the Ulama of South Africa has been recirculated again by certain individuals who cannot defend their actions Shar'an. The repeated circulation of this clip is only due to their desperation and not having any excuse for their actions.
This clip of Hazrat Mufti Saheb was part of an Ulama bayaan that he gave in Azaadville Jami Masjid in an Islāhi program.

It is a fact that Hazrat was met on that day by certain Jusa members and their sympathisers in Azaadville. Whether this was discussed with Hazrat in that meeting or at another meeting is not relevant. However, it shows the level that these "Tolerant" Ulama stoop to, to take extract some words from visiting Ulama against those who differ with them.
If someone abuses the Honourable Sahabah Radiyallāhu Anhum then they will share the platform with them and show tolerance. However, if someone speaks against "their" fisq actions; they will go on Haraam TV, radio and on social media to address this "very serious problem" which is only to be found in South Africa.
Nevertheless, this selective, hypocritical "Tolerance" can only hoodwink certain individuals and, of course, "suit" some others.

As is in the case of iftā, the Mufti answers according to the istiftā (question) posed to him. If, in an inheritance query for example, the questioner only mentioned the sons and left the daughters out, the Mufti will answer accordingly.
The same goes here. We would like to ask those who apprised Hazrat Mufti Saheb about the local "Ulama differences of opinion," what did they actually tell him?


Did those who spoke to Mufti Saheb inform him about the following:

1. They actively gave Dawat to the World cup in 2010 and even went and made Jumuah there?

This is besides other videos on stupid soccer issues that the SG of Jusa has made.

2. Did they inform Hazrat Mufti Saheb about the swot analysis they requested from Yawir Baig which they eerily seem to be following?!!

3. Did they inform Hazrat about how they tried to stampede the Muslim public to agree to the marriage bill that automatically allows the wife to give talaaq to her husband?
Did they inform him how they wanted to restrict the marriageable age?
Did they inform him of the other problems in the marriage bill that they wanted to pass?

4. Did they inform him how they arranged for Ml Tariq Jamil to come to South Africa despite being informed of his wrong ideas, especially his Shia upliftment mentality?
Even when he said that Shias should remain as Shias and spoke ill of those Ulama who speak against the Shias, they still supported him. They went on TV (with a woman?) to show their happiness with his "Tour" and even invited him for their jalsah.
When the senior Ulama of the country sent out a very beneficial and carefully worded pamphlet regarding unity without taking anyone's names, these "Tolerant" Ulama who don't like "tashaddud" wrote a letter to Raiwind describing these seniors in such words which does not suit the facade of the "Tolerance" Scholars. The letter was then translated to English and sent out to the awaam as well.
If they have not informed Hazrat about this then copies of this are available and their "direct" links to Hazrat will put high speed to the process.
The audio of Ml T Jamil is still available on their website and has not been removed (otherwise, they can remove it and sweep one more under the carpet; if they still have space).

Did they give Hazrat some kārguzāri regarding how they hosted Yawir Baig in Kruger national park for an Ulama outing in 2012 and how he told the Ulama not to worry about Shias. Rather get involved with ANC?

5. Did they inform Hazrat of

Read more ...

CLARIFICATION OF A MISREPRESENTATION OF MAULANA BHAM

Maulana Bham is known for utilizing pieces of information out of context in order to subtly brainwash the crowd to accept his Agenda.

One of the incidents he quoted in his recent stunt was an incident wherein a Sahabi was about to kill one of the enemies and at that time the enemy recited the Kalima,the Sahabi didn't believe such and went on to finish the Job,when such was related to Nabi sallalaahu alaihi wasallam he stated"Did you split open his heart?", in disapproval of such a Deed.

Maulana Bham quotes this incident as a way of brainwashing his unsuspecting crowd to accept the acts of Kufr such as interfaith Mandela celebrations and the other acts of evil he wishes to promote and to denounce anyone who speaks against such by playing on the impossibility of splitting open the chest and determining intent.

This type of manipulation is purposely meant to confuse the masses and is a gross misrepresentation of the incident due to the following

1. The incident contains a person professing an act of Imaan outwardly not an act of Kufr,which proves that when acts of Goodness are done openly, one should not unnecessarily Harbour ill opinions. Maulana Bham however wishes to carry out acts of Kufr and deviance in the same context.

Maulana Bham is simply playing on the Liberal don't judge doctrine

2. Umar radiallahu anhu refutes this notion of Maulana Bham

Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah reported: Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “Verily, people were judged by revelation in the time of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, and the revelation has ceased. We only judge now what is manifested outwardly of your deeds. Whoever shows us good, we will trust him and bring him close. It is not for us to judge anything of his inner secrets. Allah will hold him accountable for his inner secrets. Whoever shows us evil, we will never trust him or believe him even if it is said his intentions are good.”

Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2641

The reality is that intent does not play a role in evil actions such as interfaith prayer and intermingling etc, regardless of how holy the intent is for making a joint prayer on Mandela day, supporting Chelsea or intermingling with Women. ,Such intent would play absolutely no rule in rendering these vices permissible

Masaajid that allow these individuals on the podium are poisoning their own community.

JAMIATUL ULAMA SOUTH AFRICA AGAINST THE IRANIAN EMBASSY

Alhamdulillah We Finally Have A Statement of JUSA Against Shias

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wE5CGw2weX3vtyA1In-dMCcbHp0PYJ7S/view?usp=drive_link

 

SILENCE OF MAULANA EBRAHIM PANDOR (DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF JUSA)

Once again we at Qalamul Haq find ourselves in position of having to go public with a JUSA aalim.

Despite JUSA engaging in haraam such as interfaith prayers, intermingling and soccer promotions, we find Maulana Ebrahim Pandor remaining silent on these issues.

If his name (which is well respected by all) is being used by placing him in the position of Deputy president, then the right thing to do to counter the usage of such is to speak out against these wrongs.

We therefore contacted Maulana Ebrahim Pandor on multiple occasions, to which the only answer we received is silence. We have thus concluded that he is an accomplice and approves of these acts.

A simple example to explain the above is if someone uses your name to invite another person to a gathering to assassinate them and you know about the plan and the dubious behavior yet do not warn the person, you become an accomplice in the crime. The same applies here.

Perhaps others could reach out to Moulana Pandor to get a verbal or written answer on what is his stance on his organization's Haraam activities.

This may come across as hard or harsh to some and was even tough on us to pen, but it is the reality of the matter. We speak from a point of being just and for the Haq.

Let us not become part of the verse "they take their rabbis as dieties besides Allah".

The True Colors Of JUSA

Following on the previous article on the claim of JUSA that they are the continuation of Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal, below are links to the documents we mentioned:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1REOWrCTN36gOdynlpJ0oTMScXewKfx2y/view?usp=drive_link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TF_dgQ2GP3tUcKiozAfbY3rgHbFr4-kT/view?usp=drive_link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FV8RLgsAGQGu3I2i2eVfXLc1oufhuTpR/view?usp=drive_link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iHeDKm-n0MjPNAQIZHbId2cMqMhGplWx/view

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LoBsBsEeI16WC791fP0sYShnISzpl3xY/view?usp=drive_link

 

JUSA Claims To Be Jamiat Transvaal
Let's Analyse This Claim

Attached are PDF documents that have been prepared by a professor who has researched the history of the old Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal (JUT) and the current JUSA. He has based his research on using the WayBack machine which keeps digital archives of websites to base his findings and also open these archives to relevant articles, publications and guidance that was provided on issues at hand.

What is noticeable, is that around 2000+ the very same issues such as interfaith ideologies, world religious parliament, feminism, shiaism, secularism, TV, etc where also relevant issues in that period.

The archives from the old JUT website will illustrate to the reader how the Ulama at that time upheld the laws of Deen and did not wavier and inch in their responses and challenges at hand. For example, a very apt article that was published was a response to the iranian embassy that challenged them at that time.

The document shows the contrast in the manner the old JUT Ulama stood their ground on the challenges within the perimeters of Deen versus the watering down of Deen and the trade-offs in lieu of Deeni principles that are taking place currently, using the ‘difference of opinion’ slogan.

The conclusion the reader will get is that the Old JUT is vastly different from the current JUSA, it is like the east to the west. The facts are available on old JUT website. The ethos, the mission and the behaviour of the two organisations can not be reconciled.

Whilst the reader is visiting the old archived websites there are refreshing articles and Q&A’s responses that are still relevant in today’s times. The question arises why has all this material and content disappeared from the current JUSA website?

The cries of unity will only come when one disunites from the kufr ways, reconciles with the Haqq & the men of Haqq and treads back to the lessons in these archives to take future direction.In Sha Allah.

May Allah open our eyes of the heart and make the truth manifest.

Please share widely, Jazakallah Khairan

On behalf of Abu Hurairah
Professor
26 Muharram 1445
14 August 2023

Sun City And FNB Stadium. Wasting Time In Acts of Fitna and Soccer!

There advices on the unification of religions and going to sun city (also applies to chelsea supporters and those reading jummah at fnb stadium) was published by jamaitul ulama transvaal around 2001.
الحمد لله

Fataawa On Attending Places Of Fitna And On Music

Q. Is it permissible for us to go to Sun City for a holiday without partaking in gambling? TV

A. It is NOT permissible to go to Sun City even though one does not gamble. The environment and evils of that place demands that we do not even think of going there. Besides gambling, many other evils are committed by going there, such as:-

Showing support for the activities taking place there merely by going there.

Wastage of money (entrance fees, petrol money, etc.).

Wastage of time.

Not prohibiting people from committing evil.

Looking at strange women.

Talking to them.

Increasing the numbers of evil-doers.

Inevitably being negligent from the remembrance of Allah Ta'aala.

Most likely missing Salaat.

If you really ponder, then you will point out many other evils too. Visiting Sun City even though one does not gamble there is like ‘visiting’ Jahannam whilst you are a resident in Jannah, would you do so? Remember, the wrath and anger of Allah Ta'aala upon evil being committed cannot be imagined, especially in a place like Sun City. Any time the punishment of Allah Ta'aala could descend. Would a Mu’min like to die in that place? A person will be resurrected in the manner he died! May Allah Ta'aala save us from an evil death and may he take us with Imaan, whilst doing good deeds. Aameen.

 

Q.1 What is ruling concerning music and the listening thereof?

A.1 Any form of involvement in music, whether by subtle participation or direct involvement therein is totally HARĀM AND FORBIDDEN in Shariah.

Unification of Religions

While there may be accommodation in Shari’ah for co-operation between religious groups on common issues, protagonists of the inter-faith movement have now gone a step further. There has been a call for the unification of all religions, building mosques, temples, churches and synagouges in one compound, and even the printing of scriptures such as the Qur’ân and the Bible in one book.

Before giving a verdict on this new ‘unified’ religion, it is essential to know a few of the standing fundamentals of Islâm:

One of the fundamentals of Faith in Islâm is that there is no true religion on the earth except Islâm, and that it is the Final religion which abrogated all previous religions. Therefore, no other religion remains on earth by which Allâh can be worshipped except Islâm. says, "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers." [3:85].

One of the fundamentals of faith that the Qur'ân is the last Book that was revealed by the Cherisher of the Worlds. It abrogated all the Books revealed by Allâh before it, and as such no other Book has been left by which Allâh can be worshipped except the Qur'ân. Allâh, The Most High, says, "And We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (the Qur'ân) in truth, confirming the Scriptures that came before it, and trustworthy in highness and a witness over it (old scriptures). So judge between them by what Allâh has revealed, and follow not their vain desires." [5:48]

The Torah and the Bible were abrogated by the Qur'ân, and that they were changed by means of additions or deletions by their followers, as Allâh says, "So because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard. They change the words from their (right) places and have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to them. And you will not cease to discover deceit in them, except a few of them." [5:13]

Accordingly, even whatever is considered as correct in these Books, has been abrogated by Islâm. The remaining parts are altered. This is proved by the following incident. The Prophet (SAW) got angry when he saw 'Umar ibn Al-Khattab holding a sheet containing some verses from the Torah and he said to him, "O 'Umar! Are you in doubt? Have I not brought (the Message) as clear as white? If my brother Musa had been alive, he would have followed me."

Another fundamental of Faith in Islâm is that our Prophet and Messenger Muhammad (SAW) is the seal of all the prophets and messengers. Allâh says, "Muhammad (sallalahu 'alaihi wa sallam) is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of Allâh and the last (end) of the Prophets. And Allâh is Ever All-Aware of everuthing." [33:40] As such, no other messenger is left to be followed except Muhammad (SAW).

If any of Allâh's Prophets and Messengers had been alive, they too along with their followers would have followed Muhammad (SAW). Allâh says, "And (Remember) when Allâh took the Covenant of the Prophets saying 'Take whatever I gave you from the Book and Hikmah and afterwards there will come to you a messenger (Muhammad) confirming what is with you. You must then believe in him and help him.' Allâh said: 'Do you agree (to it) and will you take up My covenant (which I conclude with you)?' They said, 'We agree'. He said, 'Then bear witness; and I am with you among the witnesses (for this)." [3:81]

Another fundamentals of Islâm is that any Jew or Christian who does not embrace Islâm should be considered and designated as an unbeliever (Kafir), and such people will be the people of the Fire in accordance to Allâh's saying: "Those who disbelieve from among the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) and among al-Mushrikun (Polytheists), wee not going to leave (their disbelief) until there came to them clear evidence." [98:1]

Adulterating the fundamentals of Islâmic Faith to serve the call (for the unification of religions) is but a devious call. It aims at mixing the Truth with Falsehood, destroying Islâm, demolishing its foundations and bringing all Muslims to clear apostasy (Riddah). This can be seen in the saying of Allâh, "And they will never cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion (Islâmic Monotheism) if they can." [2:217]. Allâh Says, "They wish that you reject faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you will become equal (like one another)." [4:89]

The inevitable consequence of such evil calls are:

The cancellation of differences between Islâm and Kufr, Truth and Falsehood, and complete negation of enjoining the right and forbidding the wrong.

Breaking of barriers of alienation between Muslims and Unbelievers so that no loyalty nor Jihad nor struggle for the sake of elevating Allâh's Word on Allâh's earth may take place. Allâh, The Most High, commands: "And fight against the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolators, disbelievers in the oneness of Allâh) collectively, as they fight against you collectively. But know that Allâh is with the pious." [9:36]

If such a call (unifiocation) emanates from a Muslim, it would be considered explicit Riddah [apostasy] from Islâm. This call annuls what was proved by the Qur'ân as true, and denies that the Qur'ân has abrogated all the books that preceded it, and also negates that Islâm had abrogated all the previous religions. Based on this, the call for unification is rejected according to Shari'ah and is strictly prohibited by all evidences of Islâm in the Qur'ân, and the Sunnah.

Based on the aforesaid:

It is not permissible for any Muslim who believes in Allâh as the Rabb, in Islâm as the religion, and Muhammad (SAW) as a Prophet, to call for this abominable belief, or encourage others to join it.

It is prohibited for any Muslim to print the Torah and the Bible even independently. So how could it be permissible to print them with the Qur'ân in one book? This is but a combination of the Truth with the altered or abrogated books.

It is prohibited for any Muslim to respond to the call for building a mosque, a church, and a temple in one complex, as this would imply a confession that there are religions by which Allâh can be worshipped, besides Islâm. This would also involve a denial that Islâm is the purest of all the other religions. It would also imply a serious admission that religions are three and that people on earth may adopt whatever they wish of them, equally, and that Islâm has not superseded the religions that preceded it.

Undoubtedly, approving, believing, or accepting this call is considered Kufr (disbelief) and explicit error as it plainly contradicts the Qur'ân. It would also imply an agreement that the alterations done by the Jews and Christians are from Allâh. Moreover, it is not permissible to call churches ‘Allâh's houses’ as the Christians do not perform a correct worship that is accepted by Allâh, and it is a kind of worship not based on Islâm. Allâh says, "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the hereafter he will be one of the losers." [3:85]

Calling the Kuffâr and the People of the Book to Islâm is incumbent upon all Muslims. However, sometimes results are not achieved except through kind words and sound arguments. It should, nonetheless, be done on condition so as to not compromise any of the rules of Islâm, so that they might either be convinced of Islâm and embrace it, or reject it and die after a clear warning is given to them. Allâh says, "Say (O Muhammad) 'O People of the Scripture! Come to a word that is Just between us and you, that we worship none but Allâh, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords, besides Allâh. Then if they turn away, say, 'I bear witness that we are Muslims.'" [3:64]

SURPRISE SURPRISE

Read the article below and consider the following given our current context we facing around attending interfaith prayers, gulen movement, Abrahamic accord, etc

In your mind
1. Is the advice given relavant and factual
2. Does it provide me with guidelines to protect my Imaan
3 When do you think this article was written and published
4 Who are the publishers of this article

إن شاء الله
In a few days, we will send the responses and also a booklet with relevant links to the publishers' website that will surprise you of the wealth of guidance they provided

جزاك الله خيرا

UUCSA MEMBERS DISUNITING THE UMMAH


UUCSA Members are causing disunity in the Ummah and in South Africa by their tashaddud and hardline adherence to Liberalism and diluting Deen.They lack Adab for Allah and Nabi Sallalahu alaihi wasallam by engaging in interfaith prayers like the Nelson Mandela prayers and the church prayers for taxi violence in a church recently.

They are fragmenting the Ummah by their extremism of engaging in clear cut haraam like intermingling etc and expecting majority of the Ulama and all the Major Darul ulooms in this country to remain silent in the face of these clear cut issues.

MJC,Maulana Bham ,Maulana Raghie and crew are a fringe group in South Africa that are attempting to hijack Deen and present a new Liberal version of Islam to the Muslims of South Africa

THE SIMPLE QUESTION/POINT THAT BREAKS SHIASM

MOULANA ZAHEER MANGERAH SAHEB

Shiasm is a cult that believes that the mission of Nabi sallalahu alaihi wasallam was a total failure as those that had been entrusted to even preserve the Quran and Deen as a whole, were untrustworthy.

What Shias fail to ponder over is that Ali Radiallahu anhu had ruled over the Islamic empire for a considerable amount of time,in this time he did not change the entire Muslim Ummah into Shias, neither did he implement the various aspects of Shiasm,in fact it is recorded that he had burnt those that had Shia ideology.

Shiasm thus makes Ali Radiallahu anhu a coward for not standing up for truth in a position of Authority.

It does not make any logical sense for a Lion of Allah to become a Sheep and hide the truth.

In this manner the falsehood of Shia propaganda falls apart

HAZRAT MOULANA AHMAD SADEK DESAI (THE MAJLIS)
ADVICE & PRESCRIPTION TO GIVE UP DRUGS AND OTHER BAD HABITS

(QALAMUL HAQ ADVISES THAT THIS ADVICE BE USED TOGETHER WITH THE ADVICE GIVEN BY MUFTI MUHAMMAD DESAI IN OUR PREVIOUS POST ON THE SUBJECT)

Only wazeefahs and dua will not help. People with this problem have to apply pressure on themselves and weather the storm of depression. This is the only way. If they firmly restrains the nafs, then after some time, they will Insha-Allah, overcome the problem. Allah Ta’ala when then help him. But they has to resolve to struggle.

They should wean himself of the tablets. If a person is taking five a day, then for some days he should take only 4, then after a few days reduce to 3 and so on until he has rid himself of the evil.

May Allah Ta’ala grant the fortitude to struggle against the nafs and to be rid of this evil affliction.

(Minor edits by Qalamul Haq)

MUFTI MUHAMMAD DESAI HAFIZAHULLAH
ADVICE & PRESCRIPTION TO GIVE UP DRUGS AND OTHER BAD HABITS

Allah Ta’ala has created the human being with great ability and potential. The human being can achieve every goal that he or she wishes to achieve, provided that one is determined to achieve and makes the necessary effort in that direction.
 
There was a lady in her later forties suffering from depression for years and was addicted to pharmaceutical drugs just like you. She was even injecting herself at times. She had been for rehabilitation on several occasions, spent a great deal of money, but could not give up the habit. We constantly tried assisting with the problem and continuously made Dua to Allah Ta’ala tocure her from the illness. Allah Ta’ala cured her from the addiction through a problem. The problem was actually a mercy from the side of Allah Ta’ala. Whilst experiencing the problem she made a firm determination to give up the drugs and gave it up at once.
 
We learn from here that one requires the mercy of Allah and the firm determination to give up the evil that one is involved in.
 
To draw the mercy of Allah Ta’ala, perform 2 Rakaats of Salaah daily at night before retiring to bed,
- recite 100 times Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam,
- 500 times La Hawla Wala Quwwata Illa Billah,
- and 100 times Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam
-and then engage in Dua.
 
Continue with this practice until you finally give up the evil habit. This Kalimah is from beneath the Arsh of Allah Ta’ala and extremely effective for any problem that one may be facing.
We make Dua that Allah Ta’ala cures you from the addiction and blesses us all with a life that is most pleasing to Him.
 
AND ALLAH TA’ALA ALONE IN HIS INFINITE KNOWLEDGE KNOWS BEST!

 

Click Here for Audio

Click Here for Audio

 

The End of Nikah as we know it in South Africa

On 7 July 2023, the Minister of Home Affairs published a draft Marriages Bill, which is openfor public comment. If the Bill is enacted in its current form, it will mean the end of Nikah aswe commonly know it.

To be clear, the concept of Nikah will remain. However, the generally accepted procedure is what is in jeopardy of being rendered obsolete.

For the Muslim community, Nikah usually takes on the following procedure:
-The prospective bride appoints a male representative, more often her father,
brother, uncle or so forth.
-Nikah takes place in the Musjid.
-The Imaam conducts the Nikah “ceremony” (if one would want to call it such). He
recites the Sunnah khutbah.
-Thereafter, in presence of the congregation and upon the instruction of the bride’s
representative, makes the marriage offer to the husband.
-The husband verbally accepts the offer.

This has been the process largely followed from time immemorial.
The definition of “marriage” in the Bill includes Nikah. This is particularly apparent from thehistorical context of the Bill. The aim of the Bill is to rationalize all forms of marriages, including those forms of marriage which previously did not have statutory recognition. This
is clear from the preamble, which sets the backdrop for the purposeful interpretation of the provisions of the Bill.

Only a Marriage Officer may now conduct a Nikah. (S22(8)). If the Imaam / Sheikh / Maulanais not a registered Marriage Officer, he may not conduct the Nikah. If he does so, he will beguilty of an offence, and is liable to be jailed for up to 5 years.
If the Imaam / Sheikh / Maulana is indeed a registered Marriage Officer, then the next hurdle will be that the Nikah must take place in the presence of the prospective bride, bridegroom and the two witnesses. All will have to be present in the same sitting. (S15(2)).

In other words, the presence of the bride’s male representative will not suffice. She has tobe there in the Musjid in person. This obviously poses a challenge One suggestion that has been contemplated is that the Marriage Officer, in some other private setting, ensures that the requirements of the Bill are met. This could be either before or after the Nikah “ceremony” held in the Musjid. For example, the Marriage Officer goes to the house of the prospective bride. The prospective bridegroom is also seated before him, as well as the two witnesses. He then solemnizes the marriage in compliance with the Bill.

If this private solemnization is undertaken before the Nikah to be held in the Musjid, then very often (depending on the other requirements of a valid Nikah being complied with), a valid Nikah then comes into operation by way of this solemnization in the private sitting.
This will render the Nikah in the Musjid thereafter as a bare sham. It will merely be a mock ceremony for public consumption, not the actual coming into being of a Nikah.
And if the Nikah in the Musjid is followed up by the private solemnization, then technicallythe Nikah held in the Musjid (with the absence of the prospective bride) falls foul of the law, for which Imaam / Sheikh / Maulana can be held criminally liable. This is so since the
“ceremony” in the Musjid will be regarded as, from a legal perspective, being an attempted solemnization which does not comply with the provisions of the Bill.

Currently, Muslim Marriage Officers are, in relation to the need, too few in number. This will make it difficult for all communities to have reasonable access to such officers.
Furthermore, given these provisions and the current trend in some quarters towards “modernization” and “reformation” of the Shari’ah, many modern-minded “Muslims” will gravitate towards totally doing away with the Sunnah procedure of having the Nikah in the
Musjid, and opting to only have a new version of Nikah outside the Musjid, with the prospective bride being present in person. The laws of Hijaab, as is unfortunately the general tendency, will be ignored. This will, over time, sound the death-knell for the procedure of
Nikah as we have all been accustomed to, and which has its basis in the Sunnah. The Hadith specifically instructs us to have the Nikah in the Musjid.

This brief article merely aims to highlight one problem found in the Bill. Other concerns will be raised, insha Allah, in due course.

Emraan Vawda (Mufti/Advocate)
30 Thul Hijjah 1444
19 July 2023

STOP!YOU ARE CAUSING FITNA
 
Sayyiduna Abu Hurayrah (radiyallahu’anhu) reports that Rasulullah (sallallahu’alayhi wasallam) said:
‘O People! How [bad] would be your condition when your women will rebel and your youth will begin to sin?’
The Sahabah (radiyallahu’anhu) said: ‘Will this [ever] happen, O Messenger of Allah?’
 
Nabi (sallallahu’alayhi wasallam) replied: ‘Yes, and even worse [is to happen]. How [bad] will be your condition when you will abandon enjoining good and forbidding wrong?’
The Sahabah (radiyallahu’anhu) said: ‘Will this [ever] happen, O Messenger of Allah?’
 
Nabi (sallallahu ‘alayhi wasallam) replied: ‘Yes, and even worse [is to happen]. How [bad] will your condition be when you will consider vice as virtue and [you will consider] virtue as vice?’
(Musnad Abi Ya’la, Hadith: 6389 and Al-Mu’jamul Awsat of Tabarani, Hadith: 9321)
 
We are living in an upside-down world wherein ,as predicted in the Hadith above,vice has become good and good has become vice.
Proclaiming oneself to have LGBT tendencies or promoting such is seen by the world as being confident and open minded while expressing a view contrary is seen as homophobic and backwards and such views are castigated as being inconsiderate and even banned.
 
In the like manner expressing views of modernism,watering down islam,perpetrating and propagating acts that are contrary to Shariah such as interfaith and free mixing is met with silence whereas any word against such is met with disdain and is called "fitna" or called a lack of respect for Ikhtilaaf in matters that have no place in the realm of valid differences.
Ironically this type of mindset is part of what Fitna really is,that is, viewing the good of standing up against evil to be Fitna and vice versa.
Is promoting and engaging in interfaith fitna or speaking against such in a time when apostasy is rife?
Is engaging in intermingling fitna or speaking against such?
So next time we hear the term "Causing Fitna "Let us reflect, Have we defined Fitna as it ought to be defined or do we feel anything that makes us uncomfortable or anything spoken against someone we adore to be "Fitna"?
FEMALE SOCCER TEAMS
(ANSWERED BY: Mufti Mohammed Desai)
 
Question:-
Is it permissible for females (girls) to play soccer (football). In other words, is it acceptable for females to play soccer against each other by creating two female teams?
 
Answer:-
A female is not permitted to emerge from her home except due to necessity (which is regarded as a necessity in Shariah). Hadrat Abdullah Bin Umar Radiallahu Anhu narrates that Rasulullah Salallahu Alaihi Wasallam is reported to have said, “A woman should be concealed. When she emerges from her home, then Shaytaan peeps at her (meaning that he pursues her and gets her involved in sin), and she does not remain more closer to Allah Ta’ala than when she is in a corner of her home (as the Shaytaan of the marketplace cannot get her involved in sin).” [Kanz-ul-Ummaal Pg.171 Vol.16]
When a woman leaves the home then Shaytaan pursues her until he gets her involved in sin, either by making her expose herself before others, or

Read more ...

Being Cautious In The Usage Of Terminology And Language And keeping Our Islamic Identity
 
Many years ago Hazarat Haji Bhai Padia رحمة الله عليه explained to us that we should not use the word Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم in our Bayaans, rather say Nabi Kareem صلي الله عليه وسلم or Rasoollulah صلي الله عليه وسلم as these are words are from the Quraan Shareef and in it is noor.
 
Alhamdulillah, most of our Ulema have followed this advice. Allah ta'ala guide us to follow on the values of our pious elders. Aameen.
Unfortunately few trends that are becoming common and are dangerous:
1. The use of scholars instead of Ulema. Remember scholars includes any university graduate.
2. Seminar and workshops instead of Muzakarah or Majlis. When such titles are given it allows Unislamic activities to be added to the occasion.
Hazarat Molana Mohammad Ilyas رحمة الله عليه hoped that through the blessed work of tabligh Islamic terminologies would become common.
Sadly many are doing contrary to this.
 
May Allah ta'ala give us true understanding of our beautiful Deen.
Aameen
A QUESTION TO JUSA AND RESPONSE TO THE SMEAR CAMPAIGN PARROTING
 
It has become a knee-jerk reaction of JUSA to respond to any exposure of their vices to be a " Smear campaign".
 
*When their lawyers advocated in favour of Musjid closure in court and it was stated that they called for such, they stated that it is a smear campaign....facts proved otherwise
*When they were exposed for Interfaith prayers and beliefs, they stated "smear campaign "...again facts proved otherwise
*Now when they are proven to have received monetary gain in order to promote the vaccine drive they state that it is a "Smear campaign "
While the figure of 12 million for JUSA alone may not be certain,what is certain is they have definitely gained monetarily from their pro Vaccine stance
 
*Firstly the Pdf outlining the beneficiaries of the solidarity fund and its media propaganda machine presents an article by JUSA member Maulana Bham amongst other religious leaders who had been pushing the heavily funded agenda.
*JUSA are listed amongst those who are sponsored by the religious forum against covid...as can be seen in attached pictures...what were they sponsored?
*JUSA actively engaged in Vaccine drives,anyone and everyone who had been involved in Vaccine drives know the amount of money offered to its promoters for each Jab delivered..can JUSA deny such?
*Can JUSA once and for all allow themselves to be audited and display the funds and its usage and salaries to the public?
 
Impact Report-Solidarity Fund
JUSA CENTURY/DISSERVICE AND DILUTION
 
The first addition of AR Rasheed was published by Jamiatul Ulama Traansvaal in 1989,the name of the newsletter was chosen by the grand mufti of India,in this newsletter of the original founders it is stated that the Quran and Sunnah clearly condemns appearing on TV.
The current JUSA mob have went against every grain of its founders by breaking the commands of Shariah and contradicting the stance of its founding Members
 
NB:
We again remind the public that jamiatul Ulama Transvaal and JUSA are two separate entities which are poles apart.
 
 
                                                        
Body Talk and Reiki
 
The following is the answer to a query received from an individual regarding a fatwa of permissibility that was earlier issued regarding several psychological healing processes for trauma cases etc. with some similarity to Body Talk and Reiki etc.
 
A: It appears that this questionnaire had been sent to several Darul Iftas and the questionnaire that was posed to one was not the same that was sent to the other. In the light of what we had initially received we had issued a fatwa. However, after examining some of the questions sent by the same person, we have reviewed the entire situation and thus retract from our original stance.
We feel that this therapy could prove to be dangerous to the imaan of many an unwary person, for some of the procedures that have been shown speak of Allah Ta`ala, the ambiyaa and malaa’ikah etc. In applying this type of a therapy, perhaps one’s fundamental beliefs and one’s reverence for the ambiyaa and respect for the Ka`bah, Multazam etc. will gradually weaken and decrease. Our greater concern is that – na`oozubillah, May Allah Ta`ala forbid – people may treat Islam, the malaa’ikah and other fundamentals of deen lightly and as fairy tales.
 
Furthermore, when looking at this art we also understand that at some point it has some connotation with Hindu cults like yogism, reiki etc. It is obvious that when an individual is drawing from these sources we cannot guarantee to what level he can go down to, for the person who is desperate looks for anything to on to to get out of the quagmire of destruction.
Hence, we oppose this method and we urge Muslims to refrain from these types of treatments.
 
Furthermore, the mashaayikh and ulama who prescribe spiritual remedial programs are very knowledgeable and understand the parameters and limits, and generally they are in control of the situation. They would know what methods need to be employed and to what extent it needs to be applied. It is a known fact that even the mashaayikh of the past perceived certain dangers in some of their prescriptions which they then totally abandoned for similar reasons.
 
It is like a surgeon who is operating on a patient. One cannot compare him to an unqualified person. He knows the limits and parameters, and he also understands what needs to be done in the case of an emergency.
Hence, we have made this abundantly clear that we no longer condone this practice. We strongly oppose it and urge Muslims as well that they should not risk their imaan and other sensitive aspects of faith for physical and mental relief.
 
Answered by:
Mufti Ebrahim Salejee (Isipingo Beach)

IMTIAZ SOOLIMAN THE PERRENELIAST ENGAGES IN CHEESE AND WINE FUNCTION

 

More Articles ...

  1. REFUTING THE APOSTATE (MURTAD) AYOOB KARIM
  2. RADIO ISLAM SEX INTERVIEW
  3. HOW JUSA SIDELINED THE SHARIAH AND MADE A U-TURN IN ORDER TO BE ON MEDIA
  4. QUESTIONS TO MUFTI SHAFIQ JAKHURA REGARDING HIS TAKAFUL LECTURE

Page 2 of 6

  • Start
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
  • End

Most Read

  • In the Name of Islam by Hazrat Maulana Yunus Patel Saheb (rahmatullah alayh)
  • Useful Links to Other Educational Sites
  • FORMATION OF THE ORIGINAL JUSA/UUCSA
  • Audio Section
  • REGARDING THE INTERFAITH PRAYERS THAT JAMIAT SOUTH AFRICA ATTENDED
  • MUFTI SIRAJ DESAI SAHEB ANSWERS QUESTIONS ON PROPOSED MMB
  • Solace in Sickness
  • SANCTITY OF THE MASJID
  • GIVEN MY PRIVILEGE AS A WOMAN, I ONLY DEGRADE MYSELF BY TRYING TO BE SOMETHING I’M NOT
  • Let them meet us on our terms (Not Television)
©2026 Qalamul Haq | Designed by fso Business Solutions
LegetøjBørnetøj